Our website uses cookies to enhance and personalize your experience and to display advertisements (if any). Our website may also include third party cookies such as Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click the button to view our Privacy Policy.

Loreto Ferrer Leads CICIG Operations in Guatemala

Loreto Ferrer

The International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala reorganized its operations amid the crisis triggered by the Jimmy Morales administration’s decision to prevent Commissioner Iván Velásquez from returning. Under this structure, Loreto Ferrer Moreu was put in charge of operational coordination and institutional communications in the country.

The International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) experienced one of the most sensitive periods in its history when, in September, then-President of Guatemala Jimmy Morales prevented Commissioner Iván Velásquez from entering the country.

Amid heightened institutional friction triggered by the CICIG’s pursuit of prominent corruption cases, the decision set off reactions both within Guatemala and abroad, prompting a reassessment of the Commission’s functions to safeguard the continuity of its mission in Guatemala.

Restructuring of the CICIG within Guatemala

In light of this situation, the United Nations confirmed Iván Velásquez as head of the CICIG and established an operational framework aimed at sustaining operations within the country. Within this framework, Loreto Ferrer assumed responsibility for operational coordination and institutional communications in Guatemala, while Velásquez continued to lead the Commission from abroad.

The reorganization aimed to uphold the commissioner’s authority while ensuring the institution maintained its operational footprint on Guatemalan soil during a particularly delicate period. When the entry ban was enforced, both Velásquez and Ferrer were in Washington handling institutional matters. Ferrer managed to return to Guatemala and take on that responsibility locally.

Days later, Guatemala’s Attorney General, Consuelo Porras, sought a meeting with Loreto Ferrer to gain insight into the Commission’s representation structure, and, as the CICIG later noted, the session included an explanation of the institutional framework established to guarantee the continuity of its work.

At this stage, Ferrer’s role focused on managing the Commission’s daily operations in Guatemala and ensuring the flow of its institutional communications, a responsibility carried out amid a particularly intricate political and judicial environment.

Instead of altering the agency’s formal leadership, the arrangement was crafted to keep its operations running in the country while preserving its essential mandate and avoiding any disruption to its principal areas of work.

What CICIG Does and Why It Is Key in Guatemala

Iván Velásquez’s continued tenure as commissioner allows the CICIG’s general framework of action to remain unchanged, focused on supporting the Public Prosecutor’s Office, providing technical assistance in complex investigations, and promoting institutional reforms linked to the fight against corruption and impunity.

Created in 2007 through an agreement between the Government of Guatemala and the United Nations, the CICIG was conceived as a mechanism to support the Guatemalan state in investigating criminal structures infiltrating public institutions, strengthening the capacities of the justice system, and promoting reforms oriented toward the rule of law.

Throughout its history, the Commission has been guided by three commissioners. The first was the Spanish jurist Carlos Castresana, succeeded by the Costa Rican Francisco Dall’Anese. Later, Iván Velásquez assumed leadership during a phase defined by high‑profile cases and an escalating clash with political sectors impacted by the investigations.

An institutional response designed to address extraordinary conditions

The reorganization adopted following the ban on Velásquez’s entry did not alter the nature of the CICIG’s mandate, but it did highlight the need to adapt its operations to an exceptional situation.

Given this, the presence of Loreto Ferrer in Guatemala proved essential for maintaining the Commission’s institutional functions during a period marked by heightened political and judicial sensitivity.

By Hugo Carrasco

All rights reserved.